Hi Steffen, thanks again for the quick help. It works fine now.
Cheers, Michael On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
And, once more: hello again! Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20180606181835.vncmv%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: |I wrote in <20180606155145.j9xm6%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: ||Michael Dressel wrote in <alpine.LNX.2.21.99.1806060914001.4219@mpslx350\ ||17.desy.de>: | ... |||I think I should not have used the -r option. Because I wanted to set |||a list of several addresses in the From: field and send carbon copies |||to several addresses via Cc:. | ... |||Now I see, using -r replaces my From: field with the single |||sender. It does correctly create the Cc: with a list of addresses. ... |||But if I don't use -r the Cc: is not created. While the From: field is |||set to the list, as I intended. ... |Anyway, it seems there are more problems with for example false |moving of addresses to secondary headers, for example in ... Indeed there was another bug in the qsort(3) call that is used to elide duplicates: it did not take into account the ponderosity of headers, so that it was dependent on the actual algorithm of qsort() which headers would be eliminated and which not. (The initial filling of the array is in order To: .. Cc: .. Bcc:.) It happens that in the test To: had to go, whereas Cc: was allowed to stay. Three bugs. What a shame! All fixed on [master] and the [stable/] series, the tests are all on [next] because cherry-picking those is a bit strange right now. |Ciao, and greetings to Hamburg! But, of course: "In Hamburg sagt man Tschü-üß". And therefore: Tschüß aus Darmstadt! (And: Marie Curie also had a husband! Always forgotten!!) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
