Edward, I don't see any reason the S-mod spec should be altered. I feel strongly that Free-moS will extend the existing standard without any alteration to it and maintain general mechanical/electrical compatibility, should the need arise to join the two together. Free-mo works the best with other Free-mo modules as the concept is maintained at a layout level.
In every other scale Free-mo in general has sold itself. I'm sure that it will be the same in S, people that see benefits in it will adopt it or ignore it...either way is fine. My lengthy emails seem to be turning into lengthy phone calls...atleast email is free. =) Chris On Dec 3, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Edward Loizeaux wrote: > I wonder how many of the Free-Mo(S) enthusiasts have contacted the > pertinent NASG committee chairman to discuss the improvements they feel > would be beneficial to S-Mod? > > I wonder how many of the S-Mod enthusiasts have contacted the pertinent > NASG committee chairman to discuss the improvements suggested by the > Free-Mo(S) folks? > > I wonder how many people wrote numerous lengthy emails on the matter > and > then just turned off their computer and either: (1) went home from > work, or (2) went to bed? Improving existing standards does take some > effort and will not happen all by itself. Hint-hint.... > > Just curious....Ed L. (endless ideas for others to do) Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
