OK, Here goes and its just my opinion for the little it's worth. If I 
wanted to build a model railroad or any other simulation involving 
mainly the physical world with all of it's geological wonders, I 
would choose something like N scale,  No doubt you could depict many 
different things such as a mountainous or a forested area without the 
thing having to reach the 'sky' of your layout space. You could 
certainly build models of things such as a lift bridge over a canal 
without the thing having to be 8 foot long in order for the 
proportions to look correct.

HO is great, but here the natural world begins to get a lot larger in 
proportin to that same space that we can muster. Mountains need to be 
quite a bit higher to appear corrrect. Having said this, you can 
start to make proper use of something called forced perception to put 
the geology into a distant background. Then the thing looks somewhat 
normal. Trains, structures and so forth become the actors on a stage 
with the backdrop taking on a some what theatrical function. You can 
add N scale structures in the background to forc the impression of 
distance. In short your world gets actually bigger and more distant 
as it were. What I like about HO is that railroad like functions such 
as a decent sized yard can be depicted as you can certainly place 
more cars in a given space than in a larger scale. I suppose you 
could have an even bigger yard in N and have it look like something 
from a photo of the real thing.

With S you are beginning to have to make an important decision. How 
much detail am I willing to have in my trains structures etc. I don't 
have a layout at present(I'm planning one for when I retire next year-
-we will be relocating at that time), but at one time or other I have 
built items across the board scale wise. I enjoy building in S the 
most for one important reason. Again, unless you have a lot of space 
and a very high ceiling, you cant do what you did in smaller scales. 
But it is much easier to add an awful lot of those wonderful things 
we call details on an S scale item. Again you can add HO or eeven 
some N structures in the background, but to do that properly you need 
to add a bit of distance from your layout edge.

O scale is known by many as the king of scales. Well it is sure 
bigger, but here again you have to push that backdrop a lot further 
back so that the trains in the front of a layout appear correct 
against a distant horizon. If detail is your thing then O certainly 
fits the bill on that one, but to operate a typical model railroad 
you need to have a barn sized structure to put it all in.

But wait, if your goal is detail and scratchbuilding, then you can 
restrict youself to a much smaller project in the larger scales. 
Something on the order od an industrial scene or part of a coal mine 
operation. Man you can add every nut and bolt or every pully and wire.

I don't know how others see this? I love trains and my hobby for 
years has been fossil collecting as well as model railroading. I sure 
saw a lot of neat places in my traves where trains ran into mountains 
and quarries and such. I always thought how can I put all of this in 
a layout. The answer for me has been you have to come to grips with 
what your goal is. I knew from the start that I would never have the 
space or money to build a diorama that looked like it belonged in the 
American Museum of Whatever. Do you want to produce an image from 
nature and restrict the detail or do you want to minimize that 
depiction of nature and produce high up close detail in your models.

Remember, it is all fun! Right? Now don't get me wrong here There 
have been a lot of tinplate layouts where the other elements of the 
scene were done beautifully and make a wonderful setting for those 
great trains that we loved as children or as those who just love 
tinplate trains. Each has to do what he likes for himself. I like S 
scale because I can make things using my eyes and hands without using 
some ort of visual aid to see what I am doing.I shouldn't say that 
too loud as the level of detail that some people will accept requires 
that you use a magnifying glass to put it all there for them. You 
know who they are. Yes, the dreaded rivit counters. L.O.L. Well, 
again it depends on what you want to do. Thank goodness, we are not 
all alike. The world would be a boring place.I have been told by 
certain Hobby shop owners that we are in another era where people 
want to buy only ready made ite,s. They say that the sale of kits are 
down. I guess that makes us scratch/bashers even more of a minority. 
I treasure the old magazines that included the work of folks like 
Jack Work and others who could make something from basicly nothing. 
Remember those guys didn't have all the wonderful Plastruct or 
Evergreen to work with. That came later.

Let's not forget those folks who enjoy the garden type railroads. 
They are a welcome part of the model railroad family as well.
I realize not everyone will agree with my diatribe here, but I felt 
that it was a story worth telling.

Well forgive me for giving everyone eye strain when they attempt to 
read all of this, but that is what I am about. That is why I belong 
to this group and treasure each and every post. It's somebody's 
experience that we get to share each and every time.

Gene Cimino





Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view 
shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO  
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to