David,
I was only planing on having the one main yard. The rest of the
railroad is sidings and scenery. I don't think I would want to
have my main yard as a hidden yard. A staging yard will be
hidden under the main yard, for my interchange with the three
RR's that deliver the cars to my main yard. That way I'll have a
reason to move cars from the industries to the main yard. From
there the interchange RR's take the cars back to the staging
yard for the next op-session.
I could hide the main yard and then the local (Clinton Valley
RR), would go get the cars and then take them to the industries
and back. If I do that then there is no interchange for the
three RR's that I want to interchange with.
That's the way my RR runs.
So your idea is good but it's just not the way I want to run
mine. I'm a prototype freelancer.
Thankx
Bob
--- David Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ---I don't mean to impose my ideas or dictate how to design
> ones
> layout, but I find visible yards a design feature i'm not
> interested
> in devoting space and other resources to. During the ongoing
> design
> for my new point-to-point switching layout,I have incorprated
> 3
> hidden stagging yards and devoted the visible layout portion
> to long
> runs between towns/industries with plenty of room for scenery.
> Am I
> the only one with this mentality?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view
shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
