Thanks Pieter, Do you see any major difference in operation and installation between the SHS and the Kadee's? It sounds like the Sargents are pretty much a purist coupler that give a good look, but are not too operationally friendly. Regards...
pieter_roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Peter; My own experience is that Kadee 802, Kadee No.5 and AM "Snaplock" dummy couplers all work pretty well with one another ... I somewhat prefer the size of the Kadee No.5, and use it on most other cars (they are eaiser to fit to most AM and any Ace conversions). I have not used the Sargent couplers, but ... would consider them more if I were starting out (depending on the level of detail and operation you plan, and on your ability to reach in to couple or uncouple at all point where that is possibly required). Pieter Roos --- In [email protected], "Peter Gagnon" wrote: > > Folks, > > I'm starting to convert my SHS and AM freight rolling stock > to "scale"couplers. I've already installed four of SHS's Kadee > compatible couplers to a couple of reefers, and am planning to put an > equal number of Kadee's into service to get a feel for the tradeoffs in > looks, operations, and ease of assembly/installation. I know that > Sargent makes S scale couplers as well, but know little else. I'd be > interested in any suggestions or pointers on this subject from you more > experienced hands. > > > Regards... > > Peter Gagnon > Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
