Thank you Richard for that very informative post.

It comes at a good time for me since I am in the throes of deciding which
track and turnouts to use.

>From your excellent report it sounds as though my suspicions are confirmed:
for a hi-scaler such as myself, not overly concerned with the visual
appearance of wheels, and one who has some LAF equipment, as well as AM, SHS
to run, I need to just go with all hi-rail, AF compatible turnouts. That
perhaps excludes me from running some of the wonderful River Raisin engines,
(if I ever acquire any) et al, on the same loop, but I can live with that. A
dedicated loop of scale height track and if required, compatible turnouts
would solve the situation. For decades our S modular layout worked pretty
much like that: one loop would run only scale, the other only hi-rail.

Roy Inman

From: Richard Karnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:44:00 -0700
To: S-Scale <[email protected]>
Subject: {S-Scale List} Review of Custom Trax turnouts and Tom's Turnouts


All --

There has been some discussion here recently about Tom's Turnouts.  Quite
coincidentally, Earl Henry was kind enough to send me a sample of both Tom's
Turnouts and Custom Trax turnouts for my assessment.  Earl's objective is to
be able to run both scale and hirail equipment on the same layout, so he has
been purchasing sample items from a variety of S turnout manufacturers.  For
my testing I used the NASG track/wheel gauge and an S Scale America
fully-equalizewd truck with scale metal wheelsets conforming to the NASG
standard for wheelsets.  Here is what I have found:

1.  Custom Trax #6 r.h. turnout with widely-spaced guard rails and a scale
frog -- This turnout may tolerate hirail wheelsets, but the wheels that
travel through the frog will bounce over it.  It will not be reliable for
scale wheelsets -- See explanation in #3 below.

This turnout is compatible with the NASG gauge with respect to track gauge
only.  Additionally, the sharp end of the curved switch point is too blunt.
It needs to be feathered to a point.

2.  Custom Trax #6 L.H. turnout with closely-spaced guard rails -- This
turnout will not tolerate hirail wheelsets.  It appears that it will handle
scale wheelsets properly.

The right-hand turnout is compatible with the NASG gauge with respect to
track gauge, frog, and guardrail flangeways.  However, the track gauge of
the left-hand turnout is inconsistent, varying from wider than the NASG
maximum to narrower than the NASG minimum.  And the sharp ends of its switch
points are too blunt.  They need to be feathered to a point.  For both
turnouts, the check gauge in the vicinity of the frog is consistent with the
NASG gauge.

3.  Custom Trax #6 r.h. turnout without guard rails -- This turnout will not
be reliable with either scale or hirail wheelsets.  Guard rails are required
to pull the wheelset away from the frog point so as to prevent the flange
that goes through the frog from "picking" the frog point.  When picking
occurs, the wheelset has a 50-50 chance of taking the wrong path through the
frog.

This turnout is compatible with the NASG gauge with respect to track gauge
and frog flangeways.  However, the sharp ends of the switch points are too
blunt.  They need to be feathered to a point.

4.  Custom Trax #8 L.H. Turnout

This turnout conforms in all respects to the NASG track gauge.  I was a
little concerned because the track gauge through the straight leg is the
minimum allowed while at the same time the guard rail seemed too far from
the stock rail.  But the check gauge is correct and therefore the test truck
tracked reliably through the turnout, even with considerable lateral force
toward the frog point.

5.  Tom's Turnouts -- These will work properly for some hirail wheelsets but
probably not for all.  The presence of guard rails requires dimensional
compatibility (back-to-back wheelset dimension that is equal to or greater
than the distance between inside of flangeways at guardrail and frog).
DIfferent manufacturers' wheelsets differ in this dimension.  SHS and AM
hirail wheelsets conform to each other.  Many AF and almost all Lionel
wheelsets do not.  None of the Tom's products will provide reliable
operation with scale wheelsets.

Scale wheelsets will not operate properly on the #6 right-hand turnout.
They drop into the frogs, and they nearly always pick the frog points
because of this. Additionally, the track gauge through both legs of the
turnout exceeds the NASG maximum dimension.

Scale wheelsets will not operate properly on the 6 left-hand turnout.  They
drop into the frogs, and they nearly always pick the frog points because of
this. Additionally, the track gauge through the straight leg of the turnout
exceeds the NASG maximum dimension, whereas the track gauge through the
curbed leg is less than the NASG minimum dimension.  These observations hold
true for both samples furnished.

6.  Tom's 9-1/2 Degree Crossing (#6 frogs) -- Crossings with rather large
angles (larger than, say, 20 degrees) are fairly immune to
frog-point-picking problems.  All you need is guard rails that are far
enough from the running rails to be non-functional (cosmetic only).  But for
shallow angles like this one, my comments in #5 above apply.

The track gauge through the lower-left-to-upper-right leg is too wide.  The
track gauge on the other leg is OK.  Scale wheelsets will not operate
properly on this crossing.  They drop into the frogs, and they nearly always
pick the frog points because of this.

I know that some of you will be unhappy with my assessment.  However, I have
confined myself to facts, which stand by themselves.

But I do have a personal observation regarding Tom's Turnouts.  These are
mechanically and aesthetically well-made.  They look exactly like the
turnouts I made as a teenager, when I was still a hirailer.  There is no
reason that a properly-gauged Tom's Turnout will not function properly as
long as wheelsets that are consistent with its check gauge measurement (the
distance between the inside edge of the frog wing rail and the inside edge
of the opposite guard rail) are used.  That said, I fail to understand how a
statement can be made that they will perform properly independent of a
wheelset's back-to-back distance.

For your reference I will be posting photos of a Tom's Turnout and a Custom
Trax turnout in our Yahoo photos section.

Dick Karnes

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to