I couldn't care less whether Hi-railers use AF or scale couplers.
Why does anyone care whether scalers have automated accessories on
their individual layouts? What am I missing?
Hi "Other Ed",
I was responding to this posting:
",,,we in "scale" could use some realistic operating accessories.
Tom Hawley -- Lansing Mich"
My assertion is that some old ACG operating accessories could be
bashed to scale and fit into a fine-scale layout and maybe Tom Hawley
& others in fine-scale just haven't explored that possibility yet,
even though it has been done repeatedly in hi-rail. When I suggested
this to Tom off List, he ignored me, so I wondered what others in
fine-scale on this List thought about it. It occurred to me that
maybe the time has come for some fine-scalers to take animation to
another level just to show what can be done in an acceptable way in
fine-scale. It sounded to me as though Ed thought it was a good idea
as well because he said he could do it. Since Ed is a prominent
figure on this List, I thought he was helping to plant the seeds of
inspiration. And why do I care about any of this? Because when
there are advancements in one part of the gauge, we all benefit.
Regards,
Tim Brown
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
