So, it's possible, then, to be an SG42SRC modeler.  Try THAT one at your local 
NMRA meet!

By the way, I've read almost all issues of Model Craftsman and Model Railroader 
from 1934 to, currently, February 1948, and note both magazines were 
differentiating between tinplaters and scale modelers BEFORE WW2.  I can't 
speak for how the modelers spoke amongst themselves.  I suspect the 
interchangeability of "gauge" and "scale" usage was because there were 
virtually no modelers in other than standard gauges.  Yes, there were 
exceptions, but they were very few.  Narrow gauge modelers were assumed to be 
modeling 3-feet gauge, and the designations, for example, were "On" or HOn".  
The trailing numbers came later as more gauges were "discovered."

Anybody remember E gauge/scale?  That was an early compromise rival to HO, 
c1935 -- 1/8" scale on 5/8" gauge track.

If you really want to get someone going, tell them On30 is a fraud -- mostly 
36-inch gauge prototypes running on 30-inch gauge scaled track.  Some nicely 
made models, but totally fictional.  In other words, it makes the AF vs. scale 
debate inconsequential.  

regards ... pqr



  ----- Original Message ----- 


  and he notes -

  Sounds like a good idea. It could be shortened to include each 
  interest such as:

  SGS for the S Gauge Scale Modeler

  SGH for the S Gauge Hi-Railer

  SGF for the S Gauge Flyer Operator

  Since 3/16th narrow gaugers have no Flyer or Hi-rail to clutter their 
  layouts, that designation would remain the same i. e. Sn2, Sn3 etc.

  The categories need not be limited as above. For example we could have:

  SGA for the S Gauge Armchair Modeler

  SGR for the S Gauge Rivet Counter

  SGL for the S Gauge Lunatic Fringe who model down to the diameter of the 
rivet!

  And finally - SGC for the S Gauge Curmudgeon like Art or myself!

  Raleigh the SGC from Maine...

  P. S. I didn't forget you Bill F., you have your own category SGB as 
  you are one of a kind and a fun guy! - R

  At 01:47 PM 2/17/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  >How about the term, Scale S Gauge, or S Gauge, Scale? It works for me!
  >
  >Gary Chudzinski
  >
  ><mailto:chudgr%40earthlink.net>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to