Conversely, there are engines labeled PRR, but not NYC.
ted larson 

--- In [email protected], "Andre Ming" <lam...@...> wrote:
>
> Dear NYC and PRR Fans:
> 
> Having read with amusement the good-natured banter on this list
concerning 
> the never-ending NYC vs PRR debate, I would now like to offer
irrefutable 
> proof that NYC is the victor and the PRR is the vanquished.
> 
> As most of you know, I railroad for a living.  I work a switch job 
> primarily, and in so doing I see an awful lot of railroad cars
travel in/out 
> of our yard and over our system to our various connections.
> 
> Today, having just made a joint, I was sitting in the cab of the
Alco and 
> looking about. Beside me is a long track full of cars that serves
one of our 
> drilling sand customers.  Right beside my engine sat a covered
hopper car 
> that caught my attention.  Believe it or not, its reporting marks were 
> "NYC".  Yup, "NYC".  And this car is not an isolated oddity. 
Recently I 
> have noticed NYC coil steel cars, boxcars, along with covered
hoppers.  I 
> NEVER see ANY cars with "PRR" reporting marks.
> 
> SOOOO...
> 
> It appears that SOMEWHERE... on someone's accounting sheet and in
the paper 
> world, the NYC still exists!
> 
> There you have it: The NYC survived and therefore displaced the PRR.
 It 
> must be the superior railroad.
> 
> :-)
> 
> (That ought to get'em started!!)
> 
> Andre Ming
>



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to