I too am puzzled by the conclusion that "S scalers do not support the  
hobby" based on the failure to obtain sufficient orders of one specific type of 
 
boxcar of one railroad.  And I do not accept any guilt that seems to  
implied for those of us in S-scale that have not ordered this kit.  My  
interest 
is primarily in railroads of the south and I like the Seaboard,  but like 
most of my favorite railroads, it is not exactly the most sought-after  
railroad in S.  Plus most of us in S already have unfinished projects, many  of 
which may never get started.  We have to prioritize and my priority is  with 
building a layout and with completing passenger car kits.  I  sympathize with 
John but disagree with his conclusion, and blame.  
 
"O" gauge!  Really!  Have fun with it but this is something I  just do not 
get!
 
 - Earl Henry, Nashville
 
 
 
In a message dated 4/11/2011 12:50:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

 
 
 
I do believe your statement that "S Scalers don't support the hobby"  is
really incorrect (for lack of a better word).

Remember that of  the total model railroad market, S GAUGE is less than 10%
and of that S  SCALE is about 20% of that, based on some of the numbers that
have floated  around on the lists. Even O is second to HO, I believe,
followed by  N?

That does not make for a big S scale market.

Then within that  SCALE market you have ERA, need and dollars amongst  other
criteria.

I model the late 90's - many of the items I've seen  listed are too early 
for
me. For example, the reefers SHS has are nice,  neat, etc but are out of
place for me.

I have bought a few things  because I wanted them but didn't really need
them. I think we've all done  that. SMMW's 44 tonners are a nice to have but
I have two Steam Depots so I  don't want anymore. I did get two of his 70
tonners - still not sure what  I'll use them for.

I model a short line with 5 locomotives in its  roster. With the AM GP9 and
the SHS switcher, I can model 4 of them. After  1999, they traded one of the
switchers to a model I don't think any Gauge  has. The 5th locomotive will
probably never be made in S. Oh well. I can  live with it.

Then there's the money. We're all getting older, and the  cash is slowly
getting tight, particularly if the wife finds out what  you're spending.

DPH had the EMD SD45 on the horizon. I want one. I  need one (well okay
that point is a bit stretched). And hopefully, when it  does arrive, the
money will be there. Amen for summer OT.

So, yes, S  Scalers are supporting the hobby. But there are a lot of factors
that  determine how far they can support it.

Ken

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011  at 8:27 AM, Bert Cutler <[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) >  wrote:

> John, I learned over 3 years ago that S scalers don't  support the hobby. 
I
> went back to O scale about 4 Months ago and the  difference is fantastic. 
I
> don't have to depend on toy trainers to get  what i want. I have almost
> gotten my collection back at about half the  price as S. The only problem 
is
> the price of Track and space. I have  picked up several Locos that is not
> evan available in S and probably  never will be. The biggest problem that 
I
> have now is Getting rid of  my remaining S which is sizeable. I have gone 
to
> 2 O scale shows and I  did not see any 3 rail. I bet the columbus show 
will
> be more toys then  scale Thanks Bert Cutler
>
>
>
>

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to