ED: I take mild exception to your assertion about the "S Gaugian" not being concerned with accuracy. I have written for Don, on and off, for over 20 years. His strict concern for accuracy is paramount. Sometimes, one of his writers may make an error that slips by him or his staff. This is understandable. His standards, however, for the written word and its inherent reliability are higher than anything that comes out each morning here in the local rag that is written by supposedly professional journalists. Short of the "New Yorker" I don't believe you can find another currently-produced magazine that has writing and reliability as consistent and correct as does the "S Gaugian." Gerry Evans In St. Louis
----- Original Message ----- From: Ed Kozlowsky To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 6:41 AM Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} True code of SHS rail? I think we need to know what's being measured. I have some sectional track I use under the Christmas tree and it's .140 high. As far as the S Gaugian is concerned, they have never been too concerned with accuracy. I'd be very surprised if they actually measured it. Ed Koz Sanford, Maine [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
