With what Dave said below in mind... the concept of a "snubber block" inside the spring cavity of the Kadee coupler is the best solution to the problem of taking out too much of the slack action, as the length of the "snubber" block would merely need to be shortened slightly to ADD more slack as desired.
John Degnan [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: ctxmf74 To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 01:25 PM Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} S-scale couplers If one is limiting the slack in the coupler care should be taken to not make it so stiff as to not be able to move backwards when pushing as the coupler/draft gear interface is designed with a flat to keep the pushing forces in column. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
