Which shows to go ya that one man¹s scale is another man¹s non-scale. In this email lies the tale of why we can¹t have passenger cars in S as they do in O, G, N, HO, On30.
Roy From: Rance Velapoldi <[email protected]> Reply-To: S-Scale <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:53:27 +0100 To: S-Scale <[email protected]> Subject: Re: {S-Scale List} MTH in S Hi: Were the AM PA's and PB's so far off the mark?? I thought they weren't too "non-scale"??? I do have the ATSF and another?? What were the basic problems (besides hi-rail wheels and couplers)? Tx. Rance Velapoldi (Tranby, Norway) On 3/1/2012 13:27, Robert Frascella wrote: > > > A third PA-1? That assumes that we've already had two. Of the two PA's out > there neither are scale nor that great. The best of the two is the Flyer > version, with the flat roof being the biggest problem. So to answer the > question, yes we need a scale PA. I'd certainly welcome one. > > > > Bob Frascella > > Wenham, MA > > > > >
