Bill,
Talk about testing design limits of a product.  Long, long time ago when I 
thought Flyer was the extent of the S universe I messed around with a PA shell 
trying to super detail it.  Part of the experiment used the KD O scale coupler 
that was metal.  It looked really good when compared to the AF claw.  Later I 
was rather disappointed to find that the S scale version was plastic.  If they 
were a sturdy metal product you could pull the house down.

I once loaded my layout with a train from nose to tail around the loop - all 
plastic.  I don't remember the count but it was up in the 50 to 60 car range.  
The train groaned squeeked and creaked around the 36" radius curves.  The track 
work failed at a turnout that had a little uneven topography before the 
couplers ever did, though some of the couplers suffered from hyper extended 
shanks.
Ben Trousdale  

--- In [email protected], "Bill Lane" <bill@...> wrote:
>
> Since Sergent has popped up again with some fans and fans in wait posting
> this came to me. I have my doubts the Sergent couplers at least in S Scale
> have been tested like the following.
> 
>  
> 
> On my layout now there is a 40 car all brass freight train. Look in my
> recent YouTube clip - you can see it. It has been 60 cars at 1 time for a
> long time when the layout first started running. Taking 20 cars off made it
> 99% reliable. Peter Vanvliet was here and in spite of oiling all axles Peter
> can attest to the real pulling forces it takes to move that train. It is
> like dragging a cinder block. 1 hopper car actually creaks moans and
> screeches like the real thing going around the curves.
> 
>  
> 
> Here is what has happened to me using Kadees.
> 
> I have broken a knuckle.
> 
> I have torn apart a Kadee coupler box - ripped it in half right at the
> screws.
> 
> A car or 2 at the front of the train regularly have they shank stuck out
> because the coupler box separates open.
> 
>  
> 
> I wonder if given the delicate nature and soft metal castings of the Sergent
> couplers if they would stand up for such pulling forces on a long term basis
> or if at all. They will not have slack action. Is that better or worse?
> 
>  
> 
> It seems that Andy just said it best. they look great, would be stunning for
> a shelf layout of easy reach while switching. But I prefer my trains to be a
> bit longer than 10 or so cars.
> 
>  
> 
> Thank You,
> Bill Lane
> 
> Modeling the Mighty Pennsy & PRSL in 1957 in S Scale since 1988
> 
> See my finished models at:
>  <http://www.lanestrains.com/> http://www.lanestrains.com
> Look at what has been made in PRR in S Scale!
> 
>  
> 
> See my layout progess at:
> 
>  <http://www.lanestrains.com/My_Layout.htm>
> http://www.lanestrains.com/My_Layout.htm
> 
> Custom Train Parts Design
>  <http://www.lanestrains.com/SolidWorks_Modeling.htm>
> http://www.lanestrains.com/SolidWorks_Modeling.htm
> 
> PRR Builders Photos Bought, Sold & Traded
> (Trading is MUCH preferred)
>  <http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRphotos.xls>
> http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRphotos.xls 
> 
> ***Join the PRR T&HS***
> The other members are not ALL like me!
>  <http://www.prrths.com/> http://www.prrths.com
>  <http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRTHS_Application.pdf>
> http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRTHS_Application.pdf
> 
> Join the Pennsylvania Reading Seashore Lines Historical Society
> It's FREE to join!  <http://www.prslhs.com/> http://www.prslhs.com 
> Preserving The Memory Of The PRSL
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to