--- In [email protected], "j.rustermier" <rustermier@...> wrote:
>
> A long time ago i did a project for the GSC truck. I've been working on 
> redoing that truck in two different versions. 
> 
> 
> VERSION I:
>  consists of 8 castings. The side frames swivel for equalization just like 
> some of the old ACE trucks and others did. The sideframe and bolster will be 
> designed so you can use either shouldered axles or taper axles, Old miller 
> axles, ACE axles, or SHS tapered axles, NWSL tapered axles that PRS used in 
> there boxcar kits, You may need to file the area of the bolster to narrow it 
> for some of these, notably the SHS axle which is shorter over all that the 
> others. No soldering is required, but a small amount of filing is. The 
> castings will come machined.
> 
> VERSION II
> 
>  This is what you see in my album if you look.  I did a test assembly of my 
> first parts out of the moulds.  These are a complete, totally independent 
> sprung axle like on the prototype GSC truck  Each journal box moves on it's 
> own. they were sprung to respond to the light weight of PRS boxcars. They 
> consist of a kit of a few casting sprues but a total of over 32 parts. NO 
> SOLDERING is required. 
> 
> Some of these trucks used a single shock absorber attached in the middle of 
> each side frame. Version one will have a VERISON IA that will include the 
> castings for this, again NO SOLDERING required.
> 
> VERSION II will have a operating two piece shock absorber. This is needed if 
> you want the drop bar to operate correctly. NO SOLDERING required
> 
> I also am working on the Roller bearing version of this truck. These were 
> used on the SP and I have no idea what other railroads. I'm so busy I don't 
> have the time to do all of that type of research!.
> 
> This truck is NOT the PRR version. That truck will come along in time.
> 
> NONE of them will come with wheel sets.
> 
> I need to do more tests before I mention price. They have to be right, they 
> have to work, or they go to the garbage can. 
> 
> I was informed that S scale was dead in the water.
> 
> Rusty
>
Rusty,  Looking good! Am interested in these also. I also had an e-mail 
"discussion" with a Proto 48 modeler who likes to think S is a dying scale. How 
can anyone be so wrong???? Sure don't look dead to me!
   Bud Rindfleisch




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to