boB, I would have you as my hogger any day. In 41 years I was injured  
twice. Both times were at the rear end of hopper trains when the hogger made a  
quick stop without air.One sent me from one end to the other,the 2nd on top 
of  the stove which fortunately wasn't lit. It was so hard that the seat was 
 ripped from the floor. Ahh,the good old days.
 
    Gary Carmichael
 
 
In a message dated 9/14/2012 7:31:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

 
 
 
My preferred method of starting a train was to increase thel to be fully  
moving,I would reduce the throttle until that happened, sometimes going all  
the way back to idle and letting the momentum of the moving part of the 
train  finish the job.

Sometimes the caboose started so gentle the rear end  crew didn't even 
realize they were moving. Much better than putting thr  conductor's head under 
the stove, which could be hard on the  stove!

Then we had this safety supervisor try to instruct us on how to  enter a 
caboose and keep the mandatory safety glasses from fogging up, which  was 
fine, but I always wished the slack would run in on him while he was  standing 
in front of a hot stove!

boB Nicholson  _________________________________________________

--- In [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) , "Bud  
Rindfleisch" <BlackDiamondRR@...> wrote:
>
> 
>  
> --- In [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) , Bob 
Werre  <bob@> wrote:
> >
> > My wife used to work at a credit  life insurance company. Over the 
> > years, during the dying days of  the caboose, a number of 
> > brakemen/conductors were injured by the  'jerks' that happened with 
slack 
> > action. Some injuries were  fakes and some were real.
> > 
> > A former studio-mate of  mine called me one day. He had been on a jury 
> > deciding a case  brought against the SP by an employee. By the time the 
> > case was  closed he had learned all kinds of terminology of the trade. 
> > He  said I would I have fit right in.
> > 
> > So that's the  other side of slack action that I'm sure Bud, Bob and 
Gary 
> > can  attest too.
> 
> Bob, Don't forget Andre! You could always tell a  good engineer from a 
bad one by the care the good ones took in starting their  train "one car at a 
time". A good engineer can actually "feel" each and every  car by the very 
slight tug as the throttle is advanced and doesn't run 'er up  until all that 
slack is out. It is true though about some injuries being real  from the 
caboose "crack the whip" effect. Almost as dangerous as spilling hot  coffee 
fresh from the pot belly stove! The indignity of it all!
> Bud  Rindfleisch
> > 
> > Bob Werre
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > On 9/13/12 8:06 PM, prorr@ wrote:
> >  >
> > > Gent's, I guess if your modeling a 100 car multi level  auto carrier 
> > > train the KD802/808's would be right on the  money. I always have a 
> > > good chuckle when this debate shows  up. As equipment wears , 
> > > especially cushioned control  types, the amount of slack can be way 
> > > beyond the specs of  the manufacturer. As for the longitudinal 
> > > movement of the  cabin car, just model the Penn Central or other beat 
> > > up  roads. You haven't lived till you went though East Conway 
> > >  interlocking[and several others including Jacks on the middle PRR 
>  > > middle div] at track speed. Anyway's, carry on guy's, I'm enjoying  
the 
> > > show.
> > > Gary Carmichael
> >  > In a message dated 9/13/2012 12:58:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> > > rnk2202@ writes:
> > >
> > > Jim  King wrote:
> > >
> > > "His design permits Kadee  centering without the annoying slack
> > > action."
> >  >
> > > Annoying?? One of my favorite memories is seeing NYC  Mohawks
> > > (Mountains for you non-NYC fans) starting a 100-car  train. The
> > > loco would back up about a car length, bunching  up slack. Then it
> > > would pull forward, ever so slowly, taking  out the slack car by
> > > car. You could hear the clunk! clunk!  clunk! as each coupler
> > > became fully extended and each car  leapt into slow motion. The
> > > Mohawks' replacements, Alco  FA/FB lash-ups, did the same thing. 
> > > Thankfully, this is one  of the aspects of running trains on my
> > > layout that I really  enjoy -- starting a freight train and
> > > listening to the slack  take-up as the locomotive gradually moved
> > > forward.
>  > >
> > > Lest you rebut by observing that the Kadee 802/808  centering
> > > springs cause the caboose to constantly bob  longitudinally, I
> > > refer you back to my oft-repeated (in  print as well as via
> > > electrons) but little-heeded  recommendation (supported by Kadee
> > > themselves!) to  substitute a knuckle spring for the too-stiff
> > > centering  spring.
> > >
> > > Dick Karnes
> >  >
> > >
> >
>




Reply via email to