I'm going to agree with much of what Dave says.

I went with sound pretty early on, and as mentioned the motor controls weren't the best. At that point you can sell them for next to nothing ($160 original price) or use them for sound only units. I later went to Lenz, NCE and Digitrax more modern decoders and added the Soundtrax DSX sound only units. In this way I've enjoyed the sound for years before the current crop of decoders.

I install a in-line plug socket/plug on one of the wires of each decoder. Unplug one wire on decoder #1 and program #2: then do a reverse with the plugs. Sure it takes longer but I want to get some more life out of older units.

Bob Werre
PhotoTraxx



On 12/10/12 9:17 AM, Dave wrote:

While I agree with Bill that a single decoder can be simpler, there can be reasons for using two. These can include doing things that can't be done with a specific decoder or reducing the number of wires running between a steam locomotive and its tender.

If people didn't have reasons for two decoders the decoder lock function would not have been suggested or implemented. Also decoders with a SUSI interface can communicate with a second module (like a sound module), and why go to that trouble without a reason.

A recent S scale example of a two decoder factory installation is recent PBL steam locomotives. They have a Soundtraxx Tsunami for sound and motor control and a separate TCS function only decoder for additional lighting functions. Using two decoders decreases the number of wires running between the locomotive and tender besides having additional function outputs.

In the past, I used a two decoder setup as my standard because the early Soundtraxx (pre-Tsunami) had poor (IMHO) motor control compared to other decoders available at that time. So I used a Zimo decoder for motor control and a Soundtraxx DSX for sound.

And when you get into some of the more advanced features such as RailCom, Zimo's "HLU", Lenz's asymmetrical DCC "ABC", Digitrax's transponding, etc. and you want sound, your decoder choices become more limited.

Using a decoder on hand that you like certainly is a valid reason to me. There are a lot of decoder choices out there and we all have our different preferences.

Dave Heine



Reply via email to