Bob: If you measure one of the DPH trucks, you'll find it has an 8' 6" wheel base; i.e. the 41-NDO. They look the same physically as the more prevalent 41-CUDO, just 6" shorter. Doesn't sound like a lot, but you can actually see the difference under a passenger car.
BTW, I think Larry Jackman did a phenomenal job crafting those patterns and I agree with you, they are a better looking truck than either of the AM flavors... RPC #6 (page 105) indicates the 41-CUDO's date from 1949 while the shorter 41-NDO came in 1954. It is more a "passenger car nut" esoteric, but it seems counterintuitive that shorter wheelbase trucks came later in the outside swing hanger truck evolution. The 8' 6" 41-NDO's were used primarily (exclusively?) on the Budd Company "Slumbercoaches." Always trying to be different, the NYC referred to them in advertising as "Sleepercoaches." Some trivia for the NYC folks, the four "Sleepercoaches" were the only passenger cars on the NYC to ever ride on outside swing hanger trucks. I'm telling myself because of the car's weight, the shorter truck was required... >From a non-narrow gauge rivet counter... Jim Kindraka Plymouth, WI --- In [email protected], "adguytrains" <robert_hogan@...> wrote: > > Jim, Ed & all... > Sorry to have dropped off the list on this for a day. I've been busy earning > a restaurant consulting buck or two in order to stay "retired". Now back to > "real" fun. I offer the following only as additional information and not to > dispute anything previously posted. > > As best I can tell, the DPH truck REALLY IS a 41-CUDO-11 truck. I was not > privy to the history of development of this truck by Larry, but Railway > Prototype Cyclopedia Vol. 6, page 98 has four photos of this truck. The DPM > castings are identical to these photos, right down to the very small details > on the side frames. That said, there is virtually no visible difference > between the CUDO and CDO truck (slight difference in the mounting casting of > the bolster anchor). The NDO truck is also slightly different but still very > close. The DPH/BB truck could pass for any of these three types. The DPH/BB > truck uses some outstanding castings and exhibits much better detail that > either of the AM 41-N-11's. There is a real need in S scale for both of > these trucks, depending on which RR you model. > > The 41-CUDO-11 designation simply means it is a 4 wheel, single bolster truck > on a 9' wheel base with 14 1/16" pedestal openings, DISC BRAKES, OUTSIDE > SWING HANGERS and 6" X 11" roller bearings. All of this Pullman "speak" is > explained in Vol. 6 of RPC. The key differences between the AM and DPH > trucks are the Disc brakes and outside swing hangers, per Jim's comments. > Also note, there are no external brake cylinders on the prototype > CUDO/CDO/NDO trucks. These trucks were primarily used after 1954 mostly by > the UP on both new and rebuilt cars. The 41-CDO-11 was used primarily by the > ATSF. The NDO truck was used by B&O, CB&Q, NP, NYC, and SP&S. > > The 41-N-11 is a four wheel, single bolster truck with an 8'-6" wheel base > and 6" X 11" roller bearings. They had clasp brakes with externally mounted > brake cylinders/slack adjusters. These trucks were one of the most commonly > used trucks by all three car companies and were applied to cars built between > 1946 and 1955. 41-N-11 trucks were used by A&WP, ACL, B&O, C&NW, C&O, CB&Q, > D&RGW, Erie, FEC, GN, IC, L&N, MKT, N&W, NYC&StL, PRR, RF&P, SAL, SP&S, SRR, > and WofA. Note that the sprung AM version of this truck has an undersized > brake cylinder and that it is mounted on the wrong end of the truck. That's > why they still need the addition of the brass BTS parts to be correct. > > Now THIS is truly TMI, but we should try to get as much info as we can, in my > opinion, on any subject we model. Must be the old rivet counting narrow > gauger in me. > > Bob Hogan > > --- In [email protected], "raisinone" <raisinone@> wrote: > > > > The truck that Des Plaines Hobbies has (generally called "Budd Buddies") is > > the 41-NDO-11, to stick with the Pullman Company designations. These were > > first introduced in 1954 and were not really that widely used. The more > > widely used "outside swing hanger" passenger car truck was the 41-CUDO-11. > > Hindsight is always 20/20 but I've often wondered why that truck was not > > done instead. OTOH, the only real difference is the wheel base so I guess > > close enough is good enough... for most... > > > > The truck that RRM is working on is the pre-War (1937) triple bolster 43-R > > and 43-SP (again Pullman Company designations) version. These were used > > on the SP as well as the 1938 "Century" and "Broadway" trains, among > > others. Triple bolster trucks present a totally different look than either > > of the previously mentioned versions. > > > > Jim Kindraka > > Plymouth, WI > > > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
