Re: [Sab] xsl:include

[Petr Cimprich]

Matt Sergeant wrote:

> > Previously we have been doing this successfully using XT and also Xalan, but
> > have moved to Sabletron to take advantage of the significant speed gains
> > involved in a C++ parser
>
> ?? XT is faster than Sablotron according to the XSLTMark results...
>

Do you have XSLTMark data for the 0.5x? I have seen these results for the 0.44
only (the 0.44 contained a bug which had fatal consequences for the XSLTMark
benchmarks).

--
Petr Cimprich
Ginger Alliance
www.gingerall.com