Re: [Sab] xsl:include

[Tom Kaiser]

Matt,
quite on the contrary - we don't mind if you publish the benchmarks at 
all; let's face the facts. After all, bad benchmark results can usually 
be improved.

Tom

Matt Sergeant wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Tim Watts wrote:
> 
>> Petr,
>> 
>> I was looking at the data for 0.51 which he has available at
>> http://xml.sergeant.org/results.txt
>> (BTW Matt - Thanks for all your help with information on LibXSLT.  It looks
>> a fantastic product.)
> 
> 
> Eek, I didn't want to publish benchmark results! Especially not to this
> list - I've removed the URL. XSLTMark should have some updated results
> soon anyway.
>