Petr,
I was looking at the data for 0.51 which he has available at
http://xml.sergeant.org/results.txt
(BTW Matt - Thanks for all your help with information on LibXSLT. It looks
a fantastic product.)
These results are in comparison with XML::LibXSLT however, not XT, and as
they are not done on the same machine as the results on the XSLTMark web
site they cannot be used in direct comparison.
Matt, if you are reading this, XT might be a good comparison test so that
the results could be extrapolated to the results at XSMLMark.
Cheers,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Petr Cimprich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2001 12:00 PM
To: Sablotron Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Sab] xsl:include
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > Previously we have been doing this successfully using XT and also Xalan,
but
> > have moved to Sabletron to take advantage of the significant speed gains
> > involved in a C++ parser
>
> ?? XT is faster than Sablotron according to the XSLTMark results...
>
Do you have XSLTMark data for the 0.5x? I have seen these results for the
0.44
only (the 0.44 contained a bug which had fatal consequences for the XSLTMark
benchmarks).
--
Petr Cimprich
Ginger Alliance
www.gingerall.com
