But I need the classical invariants / covariants with their conventional names and normalizations in the literature. I'm not trying to do the most general SL(n,C) representation theory here.
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:12:57 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Yes, it's great, but I would rather like to see it packaged as invariants > of a representation of SL(2,C), not > as invariants of a binary form. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/rZtzxN8D3tYJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
