On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:21 AM Jan Groenewald <j...@aims.ac.za> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 11:26, François Bissey <frp.bis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like maxima.fas has not been built. Last time I saw that happen
>> in sage-on-gentoo was because the patch to build it was missing.
>> Not sure how it could happen on your setup, the log needs further inspection.
>>
>> > On 14/05/2021, at 21:18, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have been installing sage-9.3 from the tarball on a few ubuntu
>> > machines, just doing ./configure and then make.  On one machine
>> > running ubuntu 20.04.02 LTS maxima fails to build.  I have attached
>> > the log files.
>> >
>> > This is a machine on which I tried a few weeks ago to help the build
>> > process by installing as many of the dependencies as possible.  My
>> > experience so far has been that this has caused so many things to go
>> > wrong that I prefer the old way -- build everything -- since that just
>> > takes more computer time, while the new way (so far) uses a lot more
>> > of my time.
>
>
> config.log:
> ## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG libffi... ##
> ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
> configure:24887: checking for LIBFFI
> configure:24894: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libffi"
> configure:24897: $? = 0
> configure:24911: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libffi"
> configure:24914: $? = 0
> configure:25100: result: yes
> configure:25108: will use system package and not install SPKG libffi
>
> maxima log:
> Condition of type: SIMPLE-ERROR
> Error code 1 when executing
> (EXT:RUN-PROGRAM "gcc" ("-o" "binary-ecl/maxima-package.fas" 
> "-L/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib/" "/tmp/eclinit8GQbdq.o" 
> "binary-ecl/maxima-package.o" 
> "-Wl,--rpath,/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib/" "-shared" 
> "-Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib" 
> "-L/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib" 
> "-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib" 
> "-Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib" 
> "-L/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib" 
> "-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/lib" "-lecl" "-lgmp" "-lgc" ...)):
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lffi
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> Available restarts:
>
> 1. (CONTINUE) Continues anyway.
> 2. (RESTART-TOPLEVEL) Go back to Top-Level REPL.
>
> Broken at DO-COMPILE-ECL.
>  File: 
> #P"/usr/local/sage/sage-9.3/local/var/tmp/sage/build/maxima-5.44.0/src/src/maxima.system"
>  (Position #1601)
>
>
>
> Do you perhaps need to sudo apt install libffi-dev?


One way I can explain this is a broken system-wide install of libffi-dev
I don't know how this can be achieved, other than having multiple
system-wide copies of libffi,
or stuff manually removed.

The other possibility is that the linker is told not to look for
system-wide libffi - can this be achieved with -L and -Wl,-rpath ?

On the other hand, it's a bug in maxima, which does not try to check
for presense of libffi, just assumes it's there.


> It is listed as a dependency here: 
> https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html
>
> (also see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837102 from 2012)
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
> --
>   .~.
>   /V\     Jan Groenewald
>  /( )\    www.aims.ac.za
>  ^^-^^
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAg%3Dp_33NMuyuZ_zQn8%2B3oQjDhR%3DCAMAcausjD7TYoi_x9EoXQ%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq2gFHukombrSGYFc61uLPXyyDM-SoSYdUrx-KuGA%2BeD7w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to