Hi

On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 15:05, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks. Indeed, libffi is alive and well:
>
> ...
> checking for ffi_closure_alloc in -lffi... yes
> checking ffi/ffi.h usability... no
> checking ffi/ffi.h presence... no
> checking for ffi/ffi.h... no
> checking ffi.h usability... yes
> checking ffi.h presence... yes
> checking for ffi.h... yes
> checking whether we can use the existing libffi library ... yes
>

Something else is also going on:

0 jan@debian:/tmp$nl ecl-21.2.1.log |grep ffi|grep "checking whet"
   102 checking whether we can use the existing libffi library ... yes
  4732 checking whether we can use the existing libffi library ... no
0 jan@debian:/tmp$nl ecl-21.2.1.log |grep onfiguring
    36 Configuring ecl-21.2.1
  4666 Configuring ecl-21.2.1
  4733 configure: Configuring included libffi library:
0 jan@debian:/tmp$nl ecl-21.2.1.log |grep Apr
    12 Linux fermat 5.4.0-72-generic #80-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 12 17:35:00 UTC
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  4642 Linux fermat 5.4.0-72-generic #80-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 12 17:35:00 UTC
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
0 jan@debian:/tmp$

Why does it look like it was building it twice, with different results?

Regards,
Jan
-- 
  .~.
  /V\     Jan Groenewald
 /( )\    www.aims.ac.za
 ^^-^^

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAOAPrp92D%2B4tTS8jUrU_BzAzAN_Hx%2BJKgDrxh_hFqB14OYEX7w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to