On Monday, July 12, 2010, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> This would be a good reason for us to setup a separate trac server for >> the notebook. It's tempting. There's probably also a way to make it >> so >> >> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_notebook >> >> is a trac just for the notebook. > > However, at the very least one would want to have intense integration > between this and Sage's trac. What if something at this new Trac > needed to include a Sage library patch that affected someone who > doesn't develop on the notebook? Also, I see the potential for even > more balkanization when it comes to the notebook.
Separating the notebook from sage is by far the best chance we have to reduce the number of different competing notebook projects. The less tight the integration with sage the better for this.... > > - kcrisman > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
