On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > On 2/26/11 12:52 AM, William Stein wrote: >>> >>> > Personally, I don't feel the amount of money raised would be huge. But >>> > the fact commercial support was available, could make Sage more >>> > attractive to commercial customers. >> >> It's a fact that the numerical/engineering aspects of Sage already >> have commercial support from Enthought (in the US, and other companies >> elsewhere, e.g., in France), and I've heard they are currently doing >> very well. >> > > So Enthought actually supports Sage (or Sage usage in specific cases)?
I don't know if they do or not. > Or are you saying that they support numpy, scipy, etc., and since we include > those packages they sort of support part of Sage indirectly. That's certainly true. They already support precisely the part of Sage that is of the most interest to industry. And by all accounts they do a great job. -- William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
