On Jan 11, 2012 9:45 PM, "Julien Puydt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 12/01/2012 05:10, William Stein a écrit : >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Michael Orlitzky <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > On 01/11/2012 03:40 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> >> >> True, but we're talking a different order of magnitude here. Speeding >> >> up the atlas installation by just 5% would save more time than removing >> >> both bzip2 and patch. >> >> >> > >> > If we want to be sure that the user has bzip2 installed, we should >> just bzip the source tarballs =) >> > >> >> We also *need* the bzip2 devel library and headers so that the Python >> bzip2 module gets built. > > > Ah, ha! So there is an hidden dependency of the python spkg on the bzip2 spkg! > > Would the sage maintainers accept a patch making that explicit?
Nice - good point. Yes please submit a patch. Thanks! > Snark > > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
