On 01/11/12 23:10, William Stein wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Michael Orlitzky <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> On 01/11/2012 03:40 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> >>> True, but we're talking a different order of magnitude here. Speeding >>> up the atlas installation by just 5% would save more time than removing >>> both bzip2 and patch. >>> >> >> If we want to be sure that the user has bzip2 installed, we should > just bzip the source tarballs =) >> > > We also *need* the bzip2 devel library and headers so that the Python > bzip2 module gets built. >
Oh that wasn't really a serious suggestion: it makes the set of sage users (A) equal to the set of sage users with bzip2 installed (B), sure, but it does so by eliminating the users (A-B). -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
