On 15 January 2013 11:27, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As for me and my ilk, really the only advantage would be to have the
> "instant patch" thing you can do on Github and perhaps doing something
> easier than queues for big changes (which I'm not convinced branches are).
> If we can do this with Mercurial somehow as well, why switch?
This is precisely what the Evolve extension for hg does. There are
other ways to do this with hg currently, but they're not as
convenient. Evolve is like 90% ready for use, and by the time Sage can
fix its build system, I am confident that Evolve can fully replace MQ
usage, as I advertised in the main Sage devel list:
http://hg-lab.logilab.org/doc/mutable-history/html/from-mq.html
Bitbucket is also quite featureful today, although not quite up to
speed compared to Github.
- Jordi G. H.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
