> If you know what you are doing it is not hard to find. Unless of course you receive all the knowledge by hitting TAB :) > OK, name it ProjectivePlanePappian, to satisfy your TAB-happy fingers... > > Oh well, the fact that you already put a bunch of misnamed stuff into Sage does not mean that you should keep doing this and keep confusing other potential users... Cf our previous disputes about LP vs Integer LP....
Dima, you started this thread by claiming I was writing a function which did not return what it claims to return. This designs.ProjectivePlaneDesign returns a projective plane design. I hope that is clear. > Oh well, the fact that you already put a bunch of misnamed stuff into Sage does not mean that you should keep doing this and keep confusing other potential users... How can you call that misnamed ? A function "steiner_triple_system" which returns a steiner triple system ? Really ? > Cf our previous disputes about LP vs Integer LP.... Well, didn't I fix that since ? I anything, it shows I put my liking aside when it is not natural for others. Same with #15482, that I implemented myself, because it confused others. This function called designs.ProjectivePlaneDesign returns a projective plane design. Please answer yes/no to that or tell me again why you think my function claims something different from what it claims. Play it fair. Then, we can discuss the matter at hand. But so far I am the one who has NO CLUE why you would want to overspecify a method. And for this I would like ot have explanations. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
