On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> wrote: > I meant #15521, not #15482. > > And I meant "claims something different from what it returns", not "from > what it claims". > > Nathann >
Nathann: At the risk of being punch in the face by trying to mediate this slugfest, <ducks a swing> are you okay with the compromise Dima has offered: designs.ProjectivePlanePappian ? <ducks another punch> Seems simple enough and then everyone is hopefully happy:-) - David > > On 4 January 2014 14:43, Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > If you know what you are doing it is not hard to find. Unless of course >> > you receive all the knowledge by hitting TAB :) >> > OK, name it ProjectivePlanePappian, to satisfy your TAB-happy fingers... >> > >> > Oh well, the fact that you already put a bunch of misnamed stuff into >> > Sage does not mean that you should keep doing this and keep confusing other >> > potential users... Cf our previous disputes about LP vs Integer LP.... >> >> Dima, you started this thread by claiming I was writing a function which >> did not return what it claims to return. >> This designs.ProjectivePlaneDesign returns a projective plane design. I >> hope that is clear. >> >> >> > Oh well, the fact that you already put a bunch of misnamed stuff into >> > Sage does not mean that you should keep doing this and keep confusing other >> > potential users... >> How can you call that misnamed ? A function "steiner_triple_system" which >> returns a steiner triple system ? Really ? >> >> >> > Cf our previous disputes about LP vs Integer LP.... >> Well, didn't I fix that since ? I anything, it shows I put my liking aside >> when it is not natural for others. Same with #15482, that I implemented >> myself, because it confused others. >> >> This function called designs.ProjectivePlaneDesign returns a projective >> plane design. Please answer yes/no to that or tell me again why you think my >> function claims something different from what it claims. >> >> Play it fair. Then, we can discuss the matter at hand. But so far I am the >> one who has NO CLUE why you would want to overspecify a method. And for this >> I would like ot have explanations. >> >> Nathann > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
