David, Your proposal of a default parameter might actually be more flexible, as it is easy to extend, codewise. Dima On 4 Jan 2014 21:50, "David Joyner" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I meant #15521, not #15482. > > > > And I meant "claims something different from what it returns", not "from > > what it claims". > > > > Nathann > > > > Nathann: > > At the risk of being punch in the face by trying to mediate this slugfest, > > <ducks a swing> > > are you okay with the compromise Dima has offered: > designs.ProjectivePlanePappian ? > > <ducks another punch> > > Seems simple enough and then everyone is hopefully happy:-) > > - David > > > > > > On 4 January 2014 14:43, Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > If you know what you are doing it is not hard to find. Unless of course > >> > you receive all the knowledge by hitting TAB :) > >> > OK, name it ProjectivePlanePappian, to satisfy your TAB-happy fingers... > >> > > >> > Oh well, the fact that you already put a bunch of misnamed stuff into > >> > Sage does not mean that you should keep doing this and keep confusing other > >> > potential users... Cf our previous disputes about LP vs Integer LP.... > >> > >> Dima, you started this thread by claiming I was writing a function which > >> did not return what it claims to return. > >> This designs.ProjectivePlaneDesign returns a projective plane design. I > >> hope that is clear. > >> > >> > >> > Oh well, the fact that you already put a bunch of misnamed stuff into > >> > Sage does not mean that you should keep doing this and keep confusing other > >> > potential users... > >> How can you call that misnamed ? A function "steiner_triple_system" which > >> returns a steiner triple system ? Really ? > >> > >> > >> > Cf our previous disputes about LP vs Integer LP.... > >> Well, didn't I fix that since ? I anything, it shows I put my liking aside > >> when it is not natural for others. Same with #15482, that I implemented > >> myself, because it confused others. > >> > >> This function called designs.ProjectivePlaneDesign returns a projective > >> plane design. Please answer yes/no to that or tell me again why you think my > >> function claims something different from what it claims. > >> > >> Play it fair. Then, we can discuss the matter at hand. But so far I am the > >> one who has NO CLUE why you would want to overspecify a method. And for this > >> I would like ot have explanations. > >> > >> Nathann > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sage-devel" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
