On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Dima Pasechnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> David,
> Your proposal of a default parameter might actually be more flexible, as it
> is easy to extend, codewise.
> Dima
>


Thank you Dima!

Nathann: Please relax, calm down and except this as a peace offering from Dima.
Okay? An argument over semantics isn't worth it when you can get the
syntax you want. You have won!

And don't forget it is almost Happy New Year!



>
> On 4 Jan 2014 21:50, "David Joyner" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Nathann Cohen <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > I meant #15521, not #15482.
>> >
>> > And I meant "claims something different from what it returns", not "from
>> > what it claims".
>> >
>> > Nathann
>> >
>>
>> Nathann:
>>
>> At the risk of being punch in the face by trying to mediate this slugfest,
>>
>> <ducks a swing>
>>
>> are you okay with the compromise Dima has offered:
>> designs.ProjectivePlanePappian ?
>>
>> <ducks another punch>
>>
>> Seems simple enough and then everyone is hopefully happy:-)
>>
>> - David
>>
>>

...

>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to