On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:30:15AM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Longer question/comment (not directed at you, but at the general situation
> in Sage): is it a problem to have multiple parallel developments of free
> modules, one in sage.modules.free_module, one in
> sage.combinat.free_module, and then possibly a new one in this ticket? (It
> doesn't seem like a good idea to me.) Should they all be unified somehow?
> Are there any plans to do that? For my own uses, the version in
> combinat.free_module has been the most relevant, but it's not in an
> obvious place; there is nothing intrinsically combinatorial about it, is
> there? We could move it to sage.module.free_module_with_basis, for
> example...
Yes, there is a plan which is along the lines you point out: see #10673
Eric's free modules are of a different nature though, since it's about
having several/may bases simultaneously and handling the changes of
bases.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
