On May 19, 2014 2:52 AM, "Volker Braun" <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since my review request for the urgent bugfix for this: > > sage: RLF(0) < oo > False > > has been hijacked by an open-ended discussion about and whether grants ought to be acknowledged in the source tree, I'd like to break out that discussion into a separate thread. > > Questions: > * Should sources contain acknowledgements at all > * If a Sage release gets a DOI, are we required by some funding agency to acknowledge grants in it? > * Do the people writing the rules at the funding agency have a policy? a clue? > > My proposal: > > Create a top-level Acknowledgements.txt file, and put them in there if you must. > >
+1 to this as long as we can autogenerate the website ack page from this. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
