Hi!

Python XY ( https://code.google.com/p/pythonxy/ )and WinPython 
(http://winpython.sourceforge.net/) do this for years now and are working 
properly. Maybe one can use this as a start since many of the needed 
prequisites are there.

but why not concentrate on a working cygwin port, and bundle everything to 
a working standalone executable? This would avoiding rewriting and 
spliiting the code in several parts which would also need to be maintained 
seperately.

On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:15:41 AM UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby 
Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>
> It seems Sage really could do with a native windows port. I am wondering 
> how practical it would be to make a version which is a subset of Sage, with 
> something like Qt which runs on Windows,  Linux,  OSX and Solaris and has 
> the look and feel of those platforms. 
>
> It could make a Google Summer of Code project. 
>
> If a small subset could be implemented,  the chances are reasonable that 
> others might port more bits. If it could do more than a scientific 
> calculator,  that would probably be enough to get people using it.  Call it 
> "Mini Sage" or something similar to indicate it is not the full version. 
>
> I believe that there are some are some bits of Sage that uses fork and has 
> have no Windows equivalent, so those bits could be left out. Perhaps at a 
> later date a complete rewrite of such bits could form other GSOC projects. 
>
> The download size of such a subset would be smaller than the full version 
> and MUCH smaller that a virtual machine image, as one doesn't need to 
> include a complete operating system too.
>
> Wolfram Research did at one point offer a subset of Mathematica, which i 
> think was called Calc Centre, but I think it was a bit of a flop, so I 
> don't think that they sell it any more. That might be an argument for not 
> doing a partial native port. 
>
> If a partial port was done, avoiding the need for a browser, one could use 
> its own parser and provide a more confident interface.  Although many are 
> critical of Mathematica's interface,  it is more consistent than that of 
> Sage.
>
> Dave
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to