On 2014-08-25, Francesco Biscani <[email protected]> wrote: > --089e0115ece08dd452050174a8ff > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 25 August 2014 15:04, Dima Pasechnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> cause M$ is unwilling to release specifications of kernel >> calls needed to make a good modern implementation of fork(). >> >> It is a constant fight against a fundamentally shaky fork() >> as implemented in Cygwin :-( >> > > Is the fork() implementation in SUA shaky as well? > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4243880/substitute-for-forking-in-windows > http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=2391
apparently it's better, but it's only supported on certain more expensive versions of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008. to quote: Supported Operating Systems: Windows Server 2008 R2; Windows 7 Enterprise; Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit edition; Windows 7 Ultimate; Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit edition; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
