On 25 August 2014 15:04, Dima Pasechnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > cause M$ is unwilling to release specifications of kernel > calls needed to make a good modern implementation of fork(). > > It is a constant fight against a fundamentally shaky fork() > as implemented in Cygwin :-( >
Is the fork() implementation in SUA shaky as well? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4243880/substitute-for-forking-in-windows http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=2391 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
