On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 11:28:21 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > And really, I don't think that we could devise a new set of rule that > could solve this kind of dead-end situations.
That thinking is precisely whats wrong here, there is no dead end. If you dislike how Poset is being used then change it or get over it. But sulking in your corner with this never-compromising obstructionist attitude is not a way forward. Unlike dead-tree journals, Sage is not done once a ticket is closed. There will be further changes, that is how software works. And there is something worse than introducing bugs or technical debt: Not making progress. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
