On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Jori Mäntysalo <jori.mantys...@uta.fi> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Francois Bissey wrote:
>> To move to the kind of release schedule you are talking about
>> we’ll need a new release manager who has the vision for this kind
>> of things.
> What is Volker's vision? I.e. do he have some plan in his head about when to
> release 7.6?
I suspect probably. I don't believe it's ad-hoc. But I don't know
that this is documented. I find it strange, personally, that this is
left entirely up to the release manager and not by some larger
> I think that having two branches is just too much. In perfect world we could
> have LTS with bugfixes only and so on, but we have not enought manpower for
> that. But we could have some kind of decision like "7.6rc0 will be out at
> the end of April 2017."
I think it's rather bad to not be doing this.
What some large projects do, like Python, is to have multiple release
managers where each person is in charge of a specific release. So you
can have a release manager specifically dedicated to upcoming patch
releases who take care of backporting fixes and the like. This isn't
often too much work--most fixes are easy to backport--only a few
The release managers work together, but meanwhile you have someone
entirely else in charge of getting the next feature release out.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.