Dear Michael,
Le mardi 17 octobre 2017 21:49:50 UTC+2, Michael Orlitzky a écrit :
>
> On 10/17/2017 02:55 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> > So basically you want to add OpenSSL to Sage and then say
> >
> > "We know that distributing SageMath might be illegal, but it is unlikely
> > that somebody will sue. Use at your own risk!"
> >
> > I doubt that this is such a good deal.
> >
>
> Not to mention that the addition of terms under Section 7 of GPLv3
> amounts to a license change ("shall be treated as though they were
> included in this License"), and possibly requires the consent of all
> SageMath contributors.
>
> Which, by the way, is why OpenSSL has not actually relicensed. Some of
> the contributors said "no," and that's the last I heard about it.
>
> Throwing my vote away:
>
> [X] Require OpenSSL to be installed on the system.
>
That's not one of the proposed options. But it seems to imply that we
should wait for OpenSSL relicensing. If that's what you think should
happen, could you explicitly vote in that direction ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
