On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 11:20:02 AM UTC+2, James Womack wrote:
>
> I have created a ticket on Sage trac for this issue: 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25034
>

Thanks.
 

> As I mention in the ticket, I think that this issue raises a question as 
> to whether the Func_assoc_legendre_P class is correctly defined, given that 
> it now seems to cover both the Ferrers and associated Legendre functions. 
> Given that the intervals on which the functions are defined do not overlap, 
> maybe it makes sense to have a single class for both, but to give it amore 
> generic name?
>

I think it will suffice for now to put the fact in the documentation.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to