On Mar 27, 6:04 am, kcrisman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe one
> (you? :) ) can implement a catch...
At first I was interested in this change but now I'm wondering if it
is best the way it is now.
f(x) = .... defines a symbolic object as was previously mentioned. A
symbolic object is for analytical results.
It doesn't seem like it would make sense to add any approximation
relationed functions like n(..) or numerical_integral(..) to a
symbolic object.
On the other hand,....some may argue that it is best to let the Sage
user have the freedom to add anything he/she wants to a "symbolic"
function.
I'm curious what others think.
Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
