On Mar 27, 6:20 pm, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote:
> We already have plenty of approximation functions attached to the
> symbolic functions.
> sage: sin(1).numerical_approx()
Yes. I was unclear. What I meant was it wouldn't make sense to use
approximation function in the *definition* of a symbolic function...
e.g. f(x) = numerical_integral(...)
Do people want that? Or is that easy to do?
Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
