The actual cardinality is computed using the pari library (since the field is a prime field and p<10**18). I the leak is in libsingular it must come from constructing the curve, not from computing the cardinality. So it would be worth testing the loop with a new function which constructs the curve and returns nothing.
John On Apr 30, 10:47 pm, mabshoff <[email protected] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Apr 30, 9:15 am, opti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Michael, > > Hi Iram, > > > Thanks for your reply. > > I did the exact same thing under magma, and it consumes 14 meg. > > Hehe, you know how to get us going :) > > > Have you found anything new? > > I did find the cause, but I have not found a fix yet. What seems to > happens is that for each p a multivariate polynomial ring in > libSingular is leaked - all the gory details are at > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5949 > > > Regards, > > > Iram > > Cheers, > > Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
