On May 1, 2009, at 2:34 AM, mabshoff wrote: > On May 1, 2:02 am, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi John, > >> The actual cardinality is computed using the pari library (since the >> field is a prime field and p<10**18). I the leak is in >> libsingular it >> must come from constructing the curve, not from computing the >> cardinality. So it would be worth testing the loop with a new >> function which constructs the curve and returns nothing. > > Ok, this seems to indicate for me that maybe Coercion could be > involved here in some shape or form since it seems that for every > prime we iterate over we create/leak a new mv ring in libSingular. And > that cannot be a good thing :) > > No that I have a clue how to debug this, so I will poke RobertWB - I > am sure he has nothing better to do that to dive into this problem and > will be happy to debug this ;)
Yep, I bet coercion is leaking rings. I'll look at this during Sage days, if not sooner. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
