I mean ... Really, nobody cares what the smith form generators are. It's a technical problem, the user does not even have to be aware of that !
Nathann On 28 April 2014 17:19, Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> wrote: >> The default repr is in terms of smith form gens, so IMHO it makes more sense >> to default to a linear combination of smith form gens. Imagine some method >> returns an abelian group, how are you going to construct elements? > > Well, obviously by changing repr, no ? O_o > > Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
