Hi! On 2014-04-28, Nathann Cohen <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The default repr is in terms of smith form gens, so IMHO it makes more sense >> to default to a linear combination of smith form gens. Imagine some method >> returns an abelian group, how are you going to construct elements? > > Well, obviously by changing repr, no ? O_o
+1. There should of course be a command to "normalise" a product of abelian groups. But applying this normalisation by default violates the principle of least surprise, IMHO. Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
