#4302: [with patch, needs work] improve modular composition in GF(2)[x]
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: zimmerma | Owner: somebody
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.2
Component: basic arithmetic | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by malb):
Hi, I started from a vanilla 3.1.3 as follows
{{{
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/SAGE/devel/sage$ hg qinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/SAGE/devel/sage$ hg qimport ntl_decl_refactor.patch
adding ntl_decl_refactor.patch to series file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/SAGE/devel/sage$ hg qpush
applying ntl_decl_refactor.patch
patching file sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_modn_dense_ntl.pyx
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1277 with fuzz 2 (offset 0 lines).
Now at: ntl_decl_refactor.patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/SAGE/devel/sage$ hg qimport polynomial_gf2x.patch
adding polynomial_gf2x.patch to series file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/SAGE/devel/sage$ hg qpush
applying polynomial_gf2x.patch
Now at: polynomial_gf2x.patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/SAGE/devel/sage$ sage -b
}}}
afterwars I do have the modular_composition function available. I'll
address the doctest failures as soon as possible if noone else beats me to
it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4302#comment:15>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
