#4372: [with patch, needs review] Repair to totallyreal_dsage
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  jvoight        |        Owner:  was     
     Type:  defect         |       Status:  new     
 Priority:  minor          |    Milestone:  sage-3.2
Component:  number theory  |   Resolution:          
 Keywords:                 |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jvoight):

 > Any patch should be reviewed in detail regardless of nodoctest status or
 not.
 > Is there a specific reason we shouldn't remove the nodoctest on that
 file now?

 Agreed.  I'd say the code is still 'experimental'; it only most of the
 time works for me without extra effort, though this is probably because
 dsage itself keeps getting upgraded.  What is the sage philosophy here?
 The code will never be used as a component in some thing else, but I
 thought I should still share it.

 JV

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4372#comment:2>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to